rOMANIAN-ization of Hungarian Place-Names in Transylvania-a Magyar helységnevek eloláhosítása
Falsification and Identity theft by the rUMANIANS the INVADING vLACHS in Transylvania
During the twentieth century, a number of places in Romania had their names changed for various reasons. The reason for many Transylvanian name changes was to give a more “Romanian-sounding” name to certain settlements, since in many case the original Romanian name was too close to the Hungarian or German one, from which it was derived from (usually a simple re-writing of the name according to Romanian phonetics).
In this video alone I have 385 Hungarian- transylvanian Place-Names changed since the romanian occupation of Transylvania.
This is only a fraction of the Place-Names renamed-changed by the romanian occupiers in Transylvania.
Ideje már, hogy felnyíljon a világ szeme, megelégelje ezt a manipulációt, amihez elsősorban Közép-Európában kell helyreállítani a kozmikus időt, vagyis ki kell szabadítani a fizikai és szellemi rabságából az 1920-ban túszul ejtett magyarságot. Miközben elvakult és félművelt szerb, orosz, román, szlovák és cseh politikusok jajgatnak a koszovói szerbek sorsa miatt, természetesen sötéten elfeledkeznek arról, hogy ők maguk milyen lopott holmi miatt aggódnak valójában. Az orosz birodalomban a cári idők óta népek tucatjait tartják gyarmati sorban, s ha azok pisszenni is mernek valamiféle önrendelkezés jogáért, akkor a világ legnagyobb hadseregét mozgósítják ellenük. Csecsenek, cseremiszek, karjalai finnek, szibériai néptömegek, kirgizek, türkök milliói sínylődnek kiszolgáltatottan orosz fennhatóság alatt. Most érthető meg, hogy már az 1920-as években miért volt oly sürgető az utódállamokban a magyarok arányszámának megváltoztatása, idegenek betelepítése a magyar vidékekre, a magyar iskolák felszámolása, ortodox templomok építése Erdélyben, a magyar intézmények bezárása, a történelemkönyvek hazug átírása, a magyar helységnevek eltüntetése, feliratok leszedése, szobrok ledöntése…
Duration : 0:10:8
Incoming search terms for the article:
- magyar helységnevek
- transylvanian names
- erdelyi helysegnevek
- helysegnevek romanul
- transylvania names
- romanian town names
- roman helysegnevek
- jidani imputiti
- helysegnevek
- magyar roman helysegnevek
Only mongolian …
Only mongolian monkeys…
Fight Hungarians …
Fight Hungarians against the Romanian terroro and oppression. The FUTURE is yours !!! GOD SAVE all Hungarians !!!
Shalom.
You are far far far …
You are far far far away from the real history , belive me !
Your fucked-up propaganda won’t do !
As for gipsys – try to look in your own backyard – look at the way hungarian gypsi scum killed a romanian , stabbed a serbian in Veszprem.
Also you can ask your mother … about your real father!
I live in tirgu …
I live in tirgu mures and i can tell you for sure that it is a romanian city …
Milton Lehrer – …
Milton Lehrer – Transylvania: History and Reality seen by an American
go on, migrators read and weep
Stai sa ma screm sa …
Stai sa ma screm sa caut o injuratura in afara de “sa ma pis pe rasa voastra de jidani imputiti” pe care tu sa o intelegi….da..o sa-ti trantesc una in spurcaciunea ta de limba (o sa schimb mouse-ul acum ca l-am folosit la copy si paste)- Alevai eize kelev ya’anos et ima shelha ve otha gam !
@Radioshack77 – Do …
@Radioshack77 – Do you have any problem my dear Roma “friend” ? Why are you against the real history ? Communist and nationalistic lies in your country are still strong !
You GaySquadTeacher …
You GaySquadTeacher Again !
Still teaching history in the basement of the nut house ??
Great Video !
I …
Great Video !
I learn a lot of Hungary and the brave Hungarian nation !
Fight for your freedom. Never give up !!!
király
király
Thermopylae was …
Thermopylae was named by the Greeks for the hot springs located there – it is a Greek name and has a meaning in Greek. For the disputed ancient cities, the origin of the name cannot be proven in any direction.
The situation is …
The situation is the same with Sparta – it is allegedly the name of its first queen, the wife of Lakedaimon (after whom the region surrounding Sparta is allegedly named). Both are only known, outside of mythology, at least, as topographic names only – we cannot know if the city and the surrounding area were truly named after mythological characters, real people, or if the myth is an explanation for a name coming from somewhere else – there is little evidence for historians to follow.
That is because the …
That is because the names are, again not of Greek origin, or are rooted in mythology. The name “Korinthos” derives from a pre-Greek language, referred to as “Pelasgian”, which is, however, a general term used by the Greeks to refer to the different peoples that inhabited the area before them – the language itself is not precisely known.
Byzantium presents the same problem as Rome – its alleged founder, according to legend, was a person named Byzas :/
All those US cities …
All those US cities are simply named for ones in England because the colonists either lacked creativity or named the town after their hometown in Britain (the original Boston is located in Lincolnshire in the UK, and there are even two Hartfords in Britain – one in Cheshire and one in Cambridgeshire, and Chelsea is originally a district of London [for which the local football team is named as well]). The most well-known example of this would be New York (originally New Amsterdam).
as for london yes …
as for london yes you are correct, mea culpa. you might also have said that rome was named after romulus but romulus does not mean anything in latin (though some argue the it means of rome and that the first name is derived from the name of the city, not the other way around).
also paris comes from the illiad, my error again.
i said you are …
i said you are partially right, and here is why. because there are certain cities who had a distinct founder (a single person rather then a group of persons as is the norm) who were named in the honor of said person, or cities that were named in remembrance of great event, or named after some unique easily distinguishable geographical feature. however such cases are the exception not the rule. for instance sparta, corinth, byzantium, mean nothing in greek yet thermopylae means hot gates.
actually you are …
actually you are wrong. actually partially wrong. most name intentionally do not mean anything so they can be distinguished from other places (barring surnames and family which are intentionally given meaning, most of them). it is far easier to remember milano instead of ancient city by the mountains (which could be anywhere) for example.
all of towns i …
all of towns i mentioned in my previous post were built by the english colonists. exept fot the specific termination referring to a town (ton), which is only used to identify that respective place as a town to outsiders and not to grant meaning to its name, i see no recognizable elements that might indicate to the origin of the name.
so the cities i …
so the cities i mentioned do have a meaning in their founder’s language you say? then please enlighten me so that i may correct myself.
until then i fail to see why those names are the opposite of my arguments.
as for the translation part yes you are correct.
anyway lets just say you are right and cities always have a meaning could you please tell me what boston means? or perhaps hartford? maybe chelsea (the US town not the team)?
There is no set …
There is no set rule for translated or altered place-names to have a meaning in the language they are adapted to, but the original names always have a meaning in the language they come from. Your examples represent quite the opposite of what you were trying to argue.
And finally, a …
And finally, a counterexample in the case of England: London. Doesn’t mean anything in English, it is derived from the Roman name for the place, Londinium. And even in Latin, it had no meaning, it was adopted from a Celtic name, over the meaning of which there is still an ongoing debate (either having something to do with the river Thames or with the wilderness originally located there).
And the same goes …
And the same goes for the aforementioned cities as well – they have no meaning in the languages currently spoken there because the original founders named them in another language. Logically thinking, the ORIGINAL name HAD TO have meant something – people don’t name anything (places, objects, people) randomly, they name them in a way that makes sense to the person giving the name – in a way that MEANS something.
The city of Москва …
The city of Москва is named for the Москва river. As for the origin of the river’s name, there are multiple theories: it may come from ancient Finnish (where it would mean “dark” or “murky”, in reference to the water), and it may also be derived from the name of a Baltic tribe, the Moskvas. In any case, the name has no meaning in Russian because it is not of Russian origin – but it had to have meant something in the language it was named in.
Rome, according to …
, is named for its founder and first ruler, Romulus – linguists are trying to find an etymological root for the name, but as other languages spoken in the area, which the name may derive from (such as Etruscan) are, like Latin, dead languages, they have not been able to find too many leads….
Rome, according to the traditional Roman myth, of course
The cities you …
The cities you mentioned were not founded by people speaking the same language as their current inhabitants. Milano is a modification of its Latin name Mediolanum (since it was founded in Roman times). The name Mediolanum is usually taken to mean “central town” of some sort, but the “-lan” ending is of Celtic origin (the city was an important center for Celts in the region as well). Venezia comes from the similarly Latin name for the north-eastern part of the Italian peninsula.